In 2004 Medicare mandated the creation of a national ICD registry, which has been run since then by the ACC and HRS. Now, New York Times reporter Barry Meier, who has been instrumental in bringing to light ICD problems in the past, notes in a February 26 story that the ICD registry is languishing for lack of financial support from industry. Due to industry neglect, the registry has failed to identify new problems, such as the recent study showing a high rate of problems with the Sprint Fidelis leads.
Meier quotes Northwestern University’s Alan Kadish, who said “he did not think that manufacturers believed that they would ‘be fulfilling their fiduciary obligations to shareholders by funding’ studies that compare the effectiveness of their devices to those of competitors.” Now hospitals pay for their participation in the registry, but Meier writes:
Click here to continue reading…