<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AHA denies it supports Texas SHAPE legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cardiobrief.org/2009/03/09/aha-denies-it-supports-texas-shape-legislation-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cardiobrief.org/2009/03/09/aha-denies-it-supports-texas-shape-legislation-2/</link>
	<description>One-stop source for cardiology news and links</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:45:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas passes questionable law on heart screening &#171; Boston Boomer News</title>
		<link>http://cardiobrief.org/2009/03/09/aha-denies-it-supports-texas-shape-legislation-2/#comment-1478</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas passes questionable law on heart screening &#171; Boston Boomer News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardiobrief.org/?p=823#comment-1478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] vascular health, is troubling, even if it is fully disclosed on SHAPE’s website. The fact that SHAPE claimed a nonexistent AHA endorsement for the Texas bill was also unsettling. The constant and shameless self-promotion, the cheesy graphics and design of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vascular health, is troubling, even if it is fully disclosed on SHAPE’s website. The fact that SHAPE claimed a nonexistent AHA endorsement for the Texas bill was also unsettling. The constant and shameless self-promotion, the cheesy graphics and design of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editorial: SHAPE is skating on thin ice &#171; CardioBrief</title>
		<link>http://cardiobrief.org/2009/03/09/aha-denies-it-supports-texas-shape-legislation-2/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editorial: SHAPE is skating on thin ice &#171; CardioBrief]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardiobrief.org/?p=823#comment-305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] health, is troubling, even if it is fully disclosed on SHAPE&#8217;s website. The fact that SHAPE claimed a nonexistent AHA endorsement for the Texas bill was also unsettling. The constant and shameless self-promotion, the cheesy graphics and design of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] health, is troubling, even if it is fully disclosed on SHAPE&#8217;s website. The fact that SHAPE claimed a nonexistent AHA endorsement for the Texas bill was also unsettling. The constant and shameless self-promotion, the cheesy graphics and design of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AHA&#8217;s Robertson: legislation is &#8220;a very blunt instrument&#8221; &#171; CardioBrief</title>
		<link>http://cardiobrief.org/2009/03/09/aha-denies-it-supports-texas-shape-legislation-2/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AHA&#8217;s Robertson: legislation is &#8220;a very blunt instrument&#8221; &#171; CardioBrief]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardiobrief.org/?p=823#comment-273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and discuss the AHA&#8217;s position regarding the SHAPE-inspired legislation in Texas (see our previous story). Robertson confirmed that the AHA has indeed declined to endorse the proposed bill. Although [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and discuss the AHA&#8217;s position regarding the SHAPE-inspired legislation in Texas (see our previous story). Robertson confirmed that the AHA has indeed declined to endorse the proposed bill. Although [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

