The AHA has published in Circulation a position statement on comparative effectiveness that represents a small but significant divergence from the ACC’s position.
As we reported recently, earlier this year the ACC joined an industry-sponsored group seeking to separate clinical and cost-effectiveness studies. By contrast, the AHA position is more open to the inclusion of cost-effectiveness considerations:
“Comparative effectiveness research may include estimates of cost and cost-effectiveness, but comparative effectiveness research should focus on enhancing value for patients rather than minimizing costs.”