RE-LY at ESC: dabigatran in, warfarin (finally) on the way out? 3

Is the long, unhappy reign of warfarin possibly drawing to a close? The RE-LY trial may have finally identified a candidate, dabigatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor that could one day replace warfarin. Unlike warfarin, dabigatran does not require dose adjustments or anticoagulation monitoring.

RE-LY randomized 18,113 AF patients to either one of two fixed doses of dabigatran (110mg or 150 mg twice daily) or warfarin. The results of RE-LY were presented this morning at the ESC and published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine. The RE-LY investigators concluded that “compared with warfarin, the 110-mg dose of dabigatran was associated with similar rates of stroke and systemic embolism and lower rates of major hemorrhage; the 150-mg dose of dabigatran was associated with lower rates of stroke and systemic embolism but with a similar rate of major hemorrhage.”


The primary endpont was stroke or systemic embolism. Here are the main results at two years:

Primary endpoint (yearly rate):

  • warfarin: 1.69%
  • dabigatran 110 mg: 1.53% (p<001 for noninferiority)
  • dabigatran 150 mg: 1.11%, p<0.001 for superiority)

Major bleeding (yearly rate):

  • warfarin: 3.36%
  • dabigatran 110 mg: 2.71% (p<003)
  • dabigatran 150 mg: 3.11%, p<0.31)

Hemorrhagic stroke (yearly rate):

  • warfarin: 0.38%
  • dabigatran 110 mg: 0.12% (p<0.001)
  • dabigatran 150 mg: 0.10%, p<0.001)

Mortality (yearly rate):

  • warfarin: 4.13%
  • dabigatran 110 mg: 3.75% (p<0.13)
  • dabigatran 150 mg: 3.64%, p<0.051

Net Clinical Benefit– major vascular events, major bleeding, and death (yearly rate):

  • warfarin: 7.64%
  • dabigatran 110 mg: 7.09% (p<0.10)
  • dabigatran 150 mg: 6.91%, p<0.04)

The investigators found no evidence of liver toxicity, which was the downfall of ximelagatran, the previous warfarin replacement candidate. However, there were more MIs in the dabigatran groups, a finding the investigators were unable to explain.

In an accompanying editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine Brian Gage concluded that “we can rely on RE-LY,” though he saw no reason to switch existing warfarin patients to dabigatran.

Click here to view a video of AHA President Clyde Yancy.

Click here to read the Boehringer Ingelheim press release.

Here is the press release issued by the ESC:

Dabigatran vs warfarin as long-term anticoagulant therapy in atrial fibrillation: results from the RE-LY study

Barcelona, Spain, 30 August 2009: The anticoagulant dabigatran is more effective than warfarin in the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, according to results from the RE-LY study (Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY).

“Although researchers have been looking for a replacement for warfarin for several decades, nothing has been successful as an oral blood thinner,” says Professor Stuart Connolly, Director of the Division of Cardiology at McMaster University, Canada, and one of the leading investigators of the study.

The RE-LY study compared two doses of dabigatran with the current standard therapy, warfarin, in 18,113 patients with atrial fibrillation at increased risk of stroke. The study included more than 951 centres in 44 countries. Patients were enrolled over a two-year period and then followed for one further year. The study was designed to evaluate whether either of two doses of dabigatran were non-inferior to warfarin (ie, at least as good as warfarin). The results show, however, that the higher dose of dabigatran, 150 mg twice daily, significantly reduces the risk of stroke by 34% compared to warfarin. The lower dose, 110 mg twice daily, had a similar effect to warfarin in the prevention of stroke, but with significantly less major bleeding.

According to Professor Connolly, although warfarin has been the gold standard for reducing stroke in atrial fibrillation for more than 20 years, it has many problems; these include a need for monitoring by blood test measurement, and a significant risk of increased bleeding, which makes it unsuitable for many patients. “Several new drugs have been recently studied to see if they could replace warfarin,” says Professor Connolly. “None, however, has been satisfactory. Either they were not effective enough, they had too many side effects or they caused too much bleeding. This is the first time in more than 50 years that a new oral blood thinner has been developed which has been found to be both safer and more effective than existing therapy.”

Atrial fibrillation is a common disorder of the heart rhythm that affects about 1% of the population and up to 10% of people over the age of 80. The major complication of atrial fibrillation is stroke. About one in six strokes are caused by atrial fibrillation. Patients with atrial fibrillation have an annual risk of stroke of 1-10%. Anticoagulants such as warfarin are the only way to prevent these strokes.

-ENDS-

Here is the press release issued by McMaster University

New drug dramatically better for quivering hearts

Hamilton, ON (August 30, 2009) – Although warfarin has been, for more than 20 years, the gold standard for reducing stroke in atrial fibrillation, it has many problems.  Warfarin therapy needs to be monitored by blood test measurements.  Many patients cannot take this drug and there is a significant risk of increased bleeding.

In a major international trial, researchers from McMaster University are reporting the results of research on a new blood thinner, dabigatran (Pradax or Pradaxa).  In this study, dabigatran has been shown to be superior to warfarin for the reduction of stroke and also for reducing bleeding complications, especially bleeding into the brain. The study is to be presented today at the European Society of Cardiology Congress in Barcelona, Spain.

Atrial fibrillation is a common disorder of the heart rhythm that affects about one percent of the population and up to 10% of people over the age of 80.  The major complication of atrial fibrillation is stroke.  About one in six strokes are due to atrial fibrillation.  Patients who have atrial fibrillation have an annual risk of stroke between one to 10%.  Blood thinners such as warfarin are the only way to prevent these strokes.

Several new drugs have been recently studied to see if they could replace warfarin. None, however, has been satisfactory either because they were not effective enough; they had too many side effects or they caused too much bleeding.

The results of the RE-LY study, which compared dabigatran to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke, clearly show that dabigatran is superior to warfarin.  This is the first time in more than 50 years that a new oral blood thinner has been developed which has been found to be both safer and more effective than existing therapy.

“Although researchers have been looking for a replacement for warfarin for several decades, nothing has been successful,” said Dr. Stuart Connolly, a professor of medicine, director of the Division of Cardiology of the Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine at McMaster University and one of the leading investigators of the RE-LY study (Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY).

The RE-LY study compared two doses of dabigatran with the current standard therapy, warfarin, in 18,113 patients with atrial fibrillation at increased risk of stroke.  The study included more than 965 centres in 44 countries.  Patients were enrolled over a two-year period and then followed for one further year.  The study closed follow-up in March, 2009.

“The importance of the results for the RE-LY study are hard to overestimate “said Dr. Salim Yusuf, director of the Population Health Research Institute at McMasterUniversity and Hamilton Health Sciences in Hamilton. “The results are much better than we had hoped for. It is especially good that we have two doses of dabigatran that are effective and superior to warfarin in different ways.”

Dr. Connolly predicts that dabigatran will “change the way we treat patients who have atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke.  It will increase the number of patients who are able to take blood thinners safely and this will in turn greatly reduce the number of patients with atrial fibrillation suffering a stroke or dying.”

The RE-LY study was designed to evaluate whether either of two doses of dabigatran was non-inferior to warfarin.  In other words, it was designed to see if either of the two doses of dabigatran was at least as good as warfarin.  The results show, however, that the higher dose, 150 mg twice daily, significantly reduces the risk of stroke by 34% compared to warfarin, with similar rates of major bleeding.  The lower dose of dabigatran, 110 mg twice daily, was similar to warfarin in respect to stroke, with significantly less major bleeding.

The study was overseen by researchers from McMaster University; the Uppsala University in Sweden and the Lankenau Institute for Medical Research in the U.S. The study was co-ordinated by the Population Health Research Institute and sponsored by Boehringer-Ingelheim.

- 30 -

===========================================================

Don’t lose touch with CardioBrief. Click here to sign up for a daily email newsletter.

===========================================================

Click here to follow CardioBrief on Twitter and receive instant notification of new posts and links

===========================================================

3 Comments

  1. Pingback: RE-COVER at ASH: Dabigatran equals warfarin for VTE treatment « CardioBrief

  2. I have atrial fibrillation, I am on coumadine and I hope I can take soon Dabigatran, do you think it will be before the end of this year or later. Thank you in advance

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s