<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review finds &#8220;no consistent or reproducible treatment effect&#8221; for serial calcium scans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cardiobrief.org/2009/12/15/review-finds-no-consistent-or-reproducible-treatment-effect-of-serial-calcium-scans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cardiobrief.org/2009/12/15/review-finds-no-consistent-or-reproducible-treatment-effect-of-serial-calcium-scans/</link>
	<description>One-stop source for cardiology news and links</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 02:55:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calcium screening: another positive study, another critical editorial &#171; CardioBrief</title>
		<link>http://cardiobrief.org/2009/12/15/review-finds-no-consistent-or-reproducible-treatment-effect-of-serial-calcium-scans/#comment-3665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Calcium screening: another positive study, another critical editorial &#171; CardioBrief]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardiobrief.org/?p=4119#comment-3665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Review finds “no consistent or reproducible treatment effect” for serial calcium scans [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Review finds “no consistent or reproducible treatment effect” for serial calcium scans [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chagai Dubrawsky</title>
		<link>http://cardiobrief.org/2009/12/15/review-finds-no-consistent-or-reproducible-treatment-effect-of-serial-calcium-scans/#comment-2609</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chagai Dubrawsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cardiobrief.org/?p=4119#comment-2609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The value of Calcium CAT Scans,is the same as Bone
Density in Osteoporosi(Pts. who take Biphophonates).
In both cases it tells you that it means that there is calcium in either location.What does it means?Who knows,
As long as an anatomic finding does not correlate with
the physiologic value,it just remain a finding.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The value of Calcium CAT Scans,is the same as Bone<br />
Density in Osteoporosi(Pts. who take Biphophonates).<br />
In both cases it tells you that it means that there is calcium in either location.What does it means?Who knows,<br />
As long as an anatomic finding does not correlate with<br />
the physiologic value,it just remain a finding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

