Januvia Linked To Increase in Heart Failure Hospitalizations Reply

The cardiovascular effects of drugs used for glucose control in patients with diabetes have been a subject of controversy for many years now. More recently, attention has started to focus specifically on the risk for heart failure. Now, an observational study will likely raise new questions about the dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitor sitagliptin (Januvia, Merck).

In a paper published in JACC Heart Failure, Daniala Weir and colleagues analyzed insurance claims from a database of more than 7600 patients with diabetes and heart failure.

Click here to read the full post on Forbes.

 

 

About these ads

ESC Hot Lines: First Real Data On Promising Novartis Heart Failure Drug Reply

The first real details about the much-anticipated novel new heart failure drug from Novartis will kick off this year’s Hot Line sessions at the annual meeting of the European Society of Cardiology in Barcelona, Spain. The meeting runs from August 30 until September 3.

As I have previously reported, the PARADIGM-HF trial was stopped because of a highly statistically significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality in patients taking LCZ696 (a novel, first-in-class Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor) instead of the current gold standard of treatment, an ACE inhibitor….

Here is the complete list of Hot Line trials:

Click here to read the full post on Forbes.

 

Positive Results For New Oral Drug From Actelion Reply

Actelion has announced positive top-line results for a phase III trial of a new oral drug for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The drug, selexipag, is a first-in-class orally available selective prostacyclin IP receptor agonist.

The pivotal, double-blind GRIPHON study was the largest outcome trial ever performed in PAH. 1,156 PAH patients were randomized to selexipag or placebo. The company said that trial had “met its primary efficacy endpoint with high statistical significance.”

Click here to read the full post on Forbes.

 

Sharp Scrutiny From European Medicines Agency Of Amgen And Servier Heart Drug Reply

There may be trouble on the horizon for ivabradine, a heart drug marketed by Servier under the brand names of Corlentor and Procoralan. The drug is widely available in Europe and elsewhere, though it is not available in the US, where it is under development by Amgen. Although it hasn’t been widely noticed– I can find no other press reports– the European Medicines Agency said that it has started a review of the drug based on troubling findings from the SIGNIFY study. (Ivabradine is used to treat patients with long-term stable angina and long-term heart failure.)

The main results of SIGNIFY are scheduled to be presented on August 31 at the European Society of Cardiology meeting in Barcelona. But on May 8 the European Medicines Agency announced that it had initiated a review of ivabradine based on  preliminary results…

Click here to read the full post on Forbes.

 

Prophylactic ICDs Appear Effective In Less Severe HF Patients Reply

ICDs are routinely implanted in heart failure patients with ejection fractions (EFs) of 35% and lower to prevent sudden cardiac death. However, the benefits in patients at the higher end of the spectrum– between 30% and 35%– have not been well demonstrated in clinical trials, since few patients in this range have been enrolled in clinical trials.

Now a new study published in JAMA suggests that the benefits in this group are similar to the benefits in heart failure patients with more severely depressed EFs.

Click here to read the full post on Forbes.

 

FDA Approves Novel Implanted Sensor To Monitor Heart Failure Reply

The FDA announced today that it had approved the CardioMEMS Champion HF System. The small implantable device provides daily pulmonary artery pressure measurements to guide physicians in their treatment of  NYHA Class III heart failure patients who have been hospitalized for heart failure in the previous year. The system consists of three parts: a small permanent sensor implanted in the pulmonary artery, a catheter-based delivery system, and a system that acquires and processes PA pressure measurements from the implanted monitor and transfers the data to a secure database.

Click here to read the entire post on Forbes.

 

FDA Rejects Novel Novartis Drug For Acute Heart Failure Reply

Novartis said today that the FDA had issued a complete response letter for the biologics license application for RLX030. The drug, also known as serelaxin, is a recombinant form of the naturally occurring human hormone relaxin-2, which has been found to help women adjust to the cardiovascular changes that occur during pregnancy.

Click here to read the full post on Forbes.

 

 

Stem Cell Therapy To Fix The Heart: A House Of Cards About To Fall? Reply

For more than a decade cardiac stem cell therapy has attracted an enormous amount of attention, promise, and research dollars. Now an original and important new study published in BMJ finds that many of the most promising results in the field are illusory and that the potential benefits of stem cells to treat heart disease are probably far more modest than we’ve been led to believe. The study also raises disturbing questions about ethics and research conduct (and misconduct) in a high-flying field.

Researchers in the UK, led by Darrel Francis, closely scrutinized 133 reports from 49 different clinical trials testing autologous bone marrow stem cells in patients with heart disease. They found an astonishingly large number  of discrepancies in the reports– altogether more than 600  discrepancies, ranging from minor oversights to serious unexplained errors and apparent deceptions. Many errors were mathematical or statistical errors while others were more general, such as conflicting descriptions of studies as either a prospective randomized trial or a retrospective observational study.

The key finding of the study is that there was a very strong correlation between the number of discrepancies in a study and the reported improvement in heart function as measured by left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)…

Click here to read the full post on Forbes.

 

FDA Grants Fast Track Status To Amgen Heart Failure Drug Reply

Amgen announced yesterday that its new chronic heart failure drug ivabradine had been granted fast track status by the FDA. The company said the fast track designation, which is for drugs that treat serious conditions and fill an umet medical need, will aid the development and speed the review of the drug.

Click here to read the full post on Forbes.

 

Troubled NHLBI TOPCAT Trial Disappoints Reply

Although a significant portion of people with heart failure have preserved ejection fraction, none of the proven heart failure therapies has been shown to be beneficial in this important and growing heart failure subpopulation. Now a new NHLBI-funded study has failed to find a benefit in this group for spironolactone, which is a cornerstone of therapy for heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction. But trial investigators and heart failure experts believe it is too early to dismiss hope that spironolactone and other aldosterone antagonists– including Pfizer’s Inspra (eplerenone)– may eventually be found to work in this population.

TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist), published in the New England Journal of Medicine, randomized 3,445 patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) to either spironolactone or placebo.

Click here to read the full post on Forbes.

 

A New Novartis Heart Failure Drug Might Be A Blockbuster Reply

I try to avoid using words like “blockbuster” and “breakthrough” when writing about new drugs and treatments. I’ve been disappointed too many times. But, though they’ve been in short supply lately in cardiovascular medicine, sometimes there really are breakthroughs and blockbusters. In my career writing about cardiovascular medicine I’ve seen the introduction of the ACE inhibitors, statins, stents, ICDs, and clopidogrel, among others. All of these became multibillion-dollar products. Now there’s a new candidate that just might join this group. I’ll tell you why, but I can’t emphasize strongly enough that right now we only have extremely preliminary information. So be warned. And don’t be completely surprised if it does bomb out. We’ve been down this road before.

As I reported previously (here and here), early on Monday Novartis disclosed that the PARADIGM-HF trial testing LCZ696, a novel, first-in-class Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI), had been stopped early. As I later found out, the news was even better than Novartis had said in its press release. I spoke with the co-principal investigator of the trial, Milton Packer, who told me that the trial had been stopped because of a highly statistically significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality in patients taking LCZ696 instead of the current gold standard of treatment, an ACE inhibitor. Marc Pfeffer, a cardiologist at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital with long experience in heart failure, told me that he interprets “the stopping of a major clinical outcome trial for effectiveness by an experienced DSMB [Data and Safety Monitoring Board] as indicating that the final results will be both definitive and important.”

The first thing to know is that a reduction in cardiovascular mortality is a really big deal….

Click here to read the full post on Forbes.

 

 

Novartis Trial Was Stopped Early Because Of A Significant Drop In Cardiovascular Mortality 1

The largest-ever trial in heart failure was stopped early because of a highly statistically significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality, according to one of the trial’s two primary investigators.

Earlier today I reported that the PARADIGM-HF trial testing LCZ696, a novel, first-in-class Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI), had been stopped early because the trial had demonstrated a significant reduction in the combined primary endpoint of cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization. This information was taken from a Novartis press release.

But it turns out that the press release wasn’t entirely accurate. For once, a company appears to have actually downplayed a positive finding in its trial….

Click here to read the full post on Forbes.

English: Mohawk Stop Sign

English: Mohawk Stop Sign (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

MADIT-CRT Long-Term Follow-Up Shows Survival Benefit with CRT-D Reply

MADIT-CRT was an influential trial that showed a reduction in heart failure complications — but not mortality — when cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was added to an implantable defibrillator in patients with mild heart failure who also had left bundle-branch block (LBBB). Patients in the trial were followed for 2.4 years, raising questions about the long-term effects of CRT. Now, a second look at 854 patients who participated in a follow-up study, presented at the American College of Cardiology and published in the New England Journal of Medicine, suggests that over the long term, CRT may save lives in this population. MADIT-CRT was sponsored by Boston Scientific.

Click here to read the full post on Forbes.

 

 

 

MADIT-CRT Long-Term Follow-Up Shows Survival Benefit with CRT-D

FDA Advisory Panel Recommends Against Approval Of Novartis Heart Failure Drug Reply

The FDA’s Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee voted unanimously (11-0) against approval of the biologics license application (BLA) for serelaxin (proposed trade name Reasanz). The novel drug from Novartis was intended to be used in patients with acute heart failure. The once highly-promising drug, which received a ”breakthrough therapy” designation from the FDA last year, was also turned down for approval in Europe earlier this year.

Click here to read the entire post on Forbes.

 

 

FDA Reviewers Recommend Against Approval For Novartis Heart Failure Drug 1

Ahead of an important advisory panel FDA reviewers have recommended against approval of a novel drug for acute heart failure from Novartis. The once highly-promising drug, which received a ”breakthrough therapy” designation from the FDA last year, was turned down for approval in Europe earlier this year.

On Thursday the FDA’s Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee will discuss the biologics license application (BLA) for serelaxin injection (proposed trade name Reasanz) from Novartis.

Click here to read the full post on Forbes.

 

 

Phase 4 Actelion Study Misses Primary Endpoint Reply

Actelion announced today that a phase 4 study with its blockbuster drug bosentan (Tracleer) had failed to meet its primary endpoint.

The COMPASS-2 trial was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the effect of bosentan on the time to first confirmed event in patients with symptomatic pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) already receiving treatment with sildenafil.

Click here to read the full post on Forbes.

 

4 Deaths Linked To Thoratec Heart System Reply

Thoratec Corporation today issued an urgent safety advisory about a serious problem with a key component of the HeartMate II LVAS system. The company said 4 patients had died and 5 patients had a loss of consciousness or other symptoms of hypoperfusion. The episodes occurred when patients and caregivers “experienced difficulties with the process of changing from a primary system controller to their backup system controller.”

The company said that 8 of the 9 events “occurred in patients who were converted to the Pocket Controller after being originally trained on an older model, the EPC System Controller….

Click here to read the full post on Forbes.

 

HeartMate II

 

 

FDA Investigating Heart Failure Risk Linked To Onglyza Reply

The FDA said today that it was conducting an investigation of a possible increased risk for heart failure associated with the diabetes drug saxagliptin. Saxagliptin is marketed by AstraZeneca as Onglyza and Kombiglyze XR. (AstraZeneca recently completed the purchase of all rights to the drug from its manufacturer, BristolMyers-Squibb.)

The investigation stems from findings from the cardiovascular outcomes trial SAVOR-TIMI 53 trial  in which more than 16,000 type 2 diabetics were randomized to the DPP-4 inhibitor saxagliptin or placebo.

Click here to read the full post on Forbes.

 

 

 

 

European Setback For Novartis Heart Failure Drug Reply

European regulators have dealt a setback to a novel heart failure drug under development by Novartis.

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended against giving market approval to serelaxin (Reasanz) for the treatment of acute heart failure. The recommendation is based largely on the committee’s analysis of the RELAX-AHF trial, which was published in the Lancet in 2012. Here is CHMP’s explanation for their decision:

Click here to read the full post on Forbes.

 

 

 

FDA Advisory Panel To Review New Heart Failure Drug From Novartis Reply

A novel acute heart failure drug from Novartis will be evaluated next month by an FDA advisory committee, perhaps countering a long string of crash-and-burn cardiology drugs. On February 13 the FDA’s Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee will discuss the biologics license application (BLA) for serelaxin injection from Novartis. The indication is for the improvement of the symptoms of acute heart failure through reduction of the rate of worsening of heart failure. (The meeting notice has been posted in the Federal Register but has not yet appeared on the FDA website.) Last year the drug received a “breakthrough therapy” designation from the FDA.

Click here to read the full post on Forbes.

 

Cardiology in 2013: Like A Wrecking Ball 1

Perhaps I’m being overdramatic but I think  the best metaphor for the year in cardiology is Miley Cyrus on the wrecking ball.

The Guidelines Wrecking Ball: Like Hannah Montana guidelines are supposed to be boring and reliable.  But in 2013 the guidelines were more like Miley Cyrus. Like a wrecking ball, the NIH abandoned its long-entrenched and highly influential role in producing cholesterol and hypertension guidelines. Then the new ACC/AHA guidelines came along, abandoning tradition and targets and adopting a whole new approach. But the controversy didn’t go away. One easy prediction for 2014: we’ll see more debate about guidelines.

Click here to read the full post on Forbes.

Wrecking Ball

The New Guidelines

Miley Cyrus- Note: Cropped from larger image

The Old Guidelines

Can Personalized Medicine And An Adaptive Trial Design Salvage This Hard Luck Drug? Reply

Arca Biopharma today announced that it had received FDA clearance to start a phase 2B/3 trial of its novel beta-blocker, Gencaro (bucindolol) for the prevention of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure. The GENETIC-AF trial has all the hallmarks of the modern era: the drug will only be tested in patients with a genetic variation that the company believes may predict a positive response to the drug. And the trial will be one of the first to utilize the much-discussed “adaptive” trial design, starting as a phase 2B study and then possibly expanding to a phase 3 study after an interim analysis of the trial data.

But if GENETIC-AF represents the very model of a modern drug, it also serves as a good example of the pitfalls of drug development. Because this drug has been around for a very long time and has had a very troubled history.

Click here to read the full story on Forbes.

 

Michael Bristow, Arca Biopharma President and CEO

 

No Support For Broad Screening Of Chronic Kidney Disease 1

Although taught in  medical school and widely used in clinical practice, broad screening of otherwise healthy people for chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unwarranted, according to new recommendations from the American College of Physicians published in the Annals of Internal Medicine. People with early kidney disease, who are classified as having stages 1 to 3 CKD, usually do not have symptoms and are generally diagnosed with labarotory tests or imaging. People who progress to advanced kidney disease are at greatly increased risk for dialysis, end-stage renal disease, and death.

The authors of “Screening, Monitoring, and Treatment of Stage 1-3 Chronic Kidney Disease” discuss the paucity of evidence in the field and highlight the absence of randomized, controlled trials evaluating the risks and benefits of screening for CKD or evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of screening tests.

Click here to read the full post on Forbes.

 

 

CardioMEMS Heart Failure Device Gets Mixed Reception From FDA Advisory Panel Reply

The FDA’s Circulatory System Devices Panel sent a mixed message to the FDA today about CardioMEMS Champion HF Pressure Measurement System.  The small implantable device provides provides daily pulmonary artery pressure measurements to guide physicians in their treatment of patients with congestive heart failure.

In December 2011 the same panel voted 9-1 that the device was safe, 7-3 that the device had not been shown to be effective, and 6-4 that the benefits did not outweigh the risks. Now, two years, later, the vote wasn’t much different: the panel agreed unanimously (11-0) that the device was safe; 7-4 that it had not been shown  to be effective, and 6-4-1 that the benefits outweighed the risks.

Click here to read the full story on Forbes.

 

CardioMEMS wireless sensor with quarter

 

Study Raises Questions About Digoxin Use Today Reply

Digitalis is one of the oldest medicines in the cardiovascular arsenal. When William Withering identified digitalis as the active ingredient in the foxglove plant more than 200 years ago he was only codifying a longstanding folk remedy for heart failure, or “dropsy” as it was known then.

Digitalis fully entered the modern era with the publication of the DIG trial in 1997. The trial found that digitalis reduced hospitalization for heart failure but did not have an impact on mortality. On the basis of the trial digitalis received recommendations in the US and European guidelines for use in patients with systolic heart failure who remain symptomatic despite optimal therapy. However, the epidemiology and treatment of heart failure have evolved considerably since then. Now the authors of a new study, supported by an accompanying editorial, say that these recommendations need to be reconsidered.

In a study published in Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, James Freeman and colleagues followed 2,891 patients with newly diagnosed systolic heart failure, 18% of whom received digitalis. After 2.5 years the digoxin users had a higher rate of death and hospitalization for heart failure…

Click here to read the full post on Forbes.