The Not So Sweet Facts About Sugar 1

A new study offers a broad overview of the use of sugar in the US diet and its consequent health implications. The good news is that the growth in sugar intake appears to have stopped and may even have slightly declined. The bad news is that people still consume way too much sugar and that that sugar is killing them.

In a paper published in JAMA Internal Medicine, Quanhe Yang, from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and colleagues analyze data about sugar use and its health effects from the NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) studies.

Click here to read the full story on Forbes. 

English: Macro photograph of a pile of sugar (...
English: Macro photograph of a pile of sugar (saccharose) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Amid Rising Tide Of Diabetes More Patients Reach Treatment Goals Reply

There’s a glimmer of good news amidst all the recent bad news about diabetes. Although the prevalence of diabetes has doubled over the last generation, more people today  are reaching their treatment goals than in the past. New data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES), published online today in Diabetes Care, show that efforts to control hemoglobin A1C, blood pressure, and LDL cholesterol in patients diagnosed with diabetes have achieved some success, but they also demonstrate that there’s enormous room for improvement.

Click here to read the full post on Forbes.

العربية: جهاز قياس غلوكوز الدم. Česky: Glukome...

Observational Study Links Common Household Chemical To Cardiovascular Disease Reply

High levels of a manmade chemical widely used in common household products and detectable in more than 98% of people may increase the risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease and peripheral arterial disease (PAD), according to a study published in Archives of Internal Medicine(The study was published online in September and will appear in this week’s print edition of Archives.)

Anoop Shankar and colleagues measured serum levels of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in 1,216 people participating in the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES) and found a strong correlation between PAD and CV disease and PFOA levels. After adjusting for other risk factors, people in the highest quartile of PFOA levels had about double the risk of CV disease and PAD:

  • Odds ratio for the top quartile of PFOA: CV disease 2.01 (1.12-3.60), PAD 2.78 (1.03-3.08), CVD or PAD 2.28 (1.40-3.71)

The authors cite several studies that support the plausibility of a harmful effect of PFOA. They duly note the risk of “residual confounding and reverse causality” but write that if their findings are replicated “the population-attributable risk of PFOA exposure on CVD risk could potentially be high.”

In an invited commentary, Debabrata Mukherjee acknowledges the limitations of the study but writes that there is enough biological plausibility in the relationship so that “it would make sense to limit or to eliminate the use of PFOA and its congeners in industry through legislation and regulation while improving water purification and treatment techniques to try and remove this potentially toxic chemical from our water supply.” But, he warns concerns about PFOA “should not dissuade us from aggressively managing known existing risk factors for CVD such as dyslipidemia, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and lack of regular physical activity.”
Click to continue reading…

CDC: 35 Million Americans Have Uncontrolled Hypertension 2

According to the Centers for Disease Control, new data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) shows:

  • 30.4% of US adults (about 66.9 million people) have hypertension.
  • 53.5% have uncontrolled hypertension (about 35.8 million people).
  • 39.4% with uncontrolled hypertension (about 14.1 million) are unaware that they have hypertension.
  • 89.4% with uncontrolled hypertension have a “usual source of health care and insurance, representing a missed opportunity for hypertension control.”

The CDC authors conclude: “The findings in this report can be used to target populations and refine interventions to improve hypertension control. Improved hypertension control will require an expanded effort from patients, health-care providers, and health-care systems.”



Survey Finds Significant Drop In Cholesterol Levels In Youths Reply

New data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), published in JAMA, show significant and perhaps surprising  improvements over the last 20 years in the lipid profile of youths aged 6-19 years. Among the key lipid parameters measured by the survey from 1988-1994 to 2007-2010:

  • Total cholesterol decreased from 165 mg/dL to 160 mg/dL (p<0.001)
  • Prevalence of elevated total cholesterol declined from 11.3% to 8.1% (p<0.002)
  • HDL increased from 50.5 mg/dL to 52.2 mg/dL (p<0.001)
  • Non-HDL decreased from 115 mg/dL to 107 mg/dL (p<0.001)

“Generally,” the authors report, “the sex-, age-, and race/ethnicity-specific trends for TC, HDL-C, and non– HDL-C were similar in direction to the overall trends and consistent with a favorable trend, although for each group, the magnitude was not the same and the trend was not always significant.”

The change over time in lipids in youths was paralleled by similar changes in adults, according to the investigators. They also note that the improvement in lipids occurred “despite an increase in obesity prevalence during the study period.”

The changes recorded in the survey are “clinically meaningful” and a “cause for optimism,” writes Sarah de Ferranti in an accompanying editorial. “But,” she asks, in the face of the increase in obesity, the decline in exercise, and other adverse trends, “why would childhood cholesterol improve?” She briefly considers several possible explanations for the improvement, including improved interventions and healthier lifestyles, but then finds “a more plausible explanation” to be “dietary shifts at a population level”:

Dietary intake of fat has declined over the past several decades and some studies suggest substitution of carbohydrates for dietary fat, particularly poor quality carbohydrates, might both promote obesity and explain some of the lipid changes reported [here].

Another less concerning cause may be the reduction in the use of trans fats over the study period, she writes.

Click here to read the press release from JAMA…